DNP810 (September 2019) Module 2 Discussion

Asked by debbie
Dated: 4th Oct'19 11:00 PM
Bounty offered: $10.99

DNP 810 Evidence-based Practice for Quality Improvement

Module 2 Discussion

Describe a scientific misconduct within the last five years involving some aspect of the process of conducting research or dissemination of findings.

Use annual reports or newsletters published by the U. S. Office of Research Integrity or other sources such as Lexus-Nexus or PubMed®.

Include the following in your description:

Name, position, employer of offender

Nature of the misconduct

Legal consequences or pending litigation from the misconduct

Actual or potential consequences for patients/public

Actual or potential consequences for EBP

Solution - DNP810 (September 2019) Module 2 Discussion
Answered by debbie
Expert Rating: 192 Ratings
Dated: 4th Oct'19 11:00 PM
5 words and 1 attachment(s).
Tutorial Rating: Not Rated
Sold 0 times.
(preview of the tutorial; some sections have been intentionally blurred)


Preview of Module-2-Discussion.docx
records     was   vital in     misconduct       after   the researcher’s     terminated       the   were accompanied     of       the   The synthetic     contributed       experienced   the patients     presented       successful   they led     of       were   for experimentations     the       responsibilities   the research     thoracic       employer   losing data     research       raw   had been     the       as   data logs     experiments ("Seven       Misconduct   Macchiarini Case,"     the       guilty   improper ethical     the       policies