WRTG391 (January 2019) Week 6 Discussion (dq1+dq2)

Asked by debbie
Dated: 7th Nov'19 09:52 AM
Bounty offered: $11.00

WRTG 391 7970 Advanced Research Writing

Week 6 Discussion

DQ1 Analyzing a Literature Review, Part I

This discussion thread is designed to help you see how a synthesis of sources essay, or literature review, is organized.

Please download the article, “Beyond Frequency: Perceived Realism and the CSI Effect,” by Evelyn Maeder and Richard Corbett.  The article is available in the e-reserves of your class.

On pages 84-85, the authors provide an introduction to the research study they conducted.   You can read this section if you would like to.  However, for this discussion thread, please read from page 85 “(“The CSI effect defined”) to page 94 (up to the section entitled “Method”).

Then answer the following questions:

1. In the first section (“The CSI effect defined”), do the authors ever give you their opinion on the CSI effect?  How do they support their definition and their expansion on the definition?  How many different sources do they cite in this section?

2. From pages 86-88, the authors discuss lawyers, police officers, judges, and community members.  In this section, do the authors ever give you their opinion on any of the issues discussed?

3.  Examine the section entitled “Verdicts” (pp. 90-92).  How do the results from the study by Shelton et al. differ from the results of the study by Kim, Barak, and Shelton?   How do the results of the study by Baskin and Sommers differ from the results of other studies?

4. As a result of having read this article, please write a few sentences about what you might have learned about a) synthesizing sources or b) the CSI effect.

DQ2 Identifying problems in a paragraph with a source

You have written a four-source essay and a six-source essay and are working toward the multiple-source essay.  Throughout the semester up to this point, you have integrated sources into your writing and have gleaned various strategies in using different ways of integrating sources.

As we conclude the course, please examine the following short paragraph on a hypothetical paper about cybersecurity and the Internet of Things.  The writer has made some errors in his integration of Shindell as a source.

Please identify at least two errors.  Describe what the errors are in a sentence or two.  (You don’t have to re-write the paragraph.  You just need to describe what the errors are.)

One potential method of hacking into a hospital’s records is through a wearable device.  Often, wearable devices are used by health care institutions to monitor blood pressure or other health conditions.  However, such devices expose vulnerabilities in the system.  (Shindell, 2018) argues that hackers increasing integrate malware to infect such devices and then use them as foundations upon which to attack the health care institution’s IT systems.  Specifically, (Shindell, 2018) maintains that ransomware is especially pernicious.  “During an attack, victims will typically encounter a screen giving them directions for paying a ransom to retrieve their data…”   “More than half of hospitals surveyed were hit with ransomware in the previous 12 months.”

Solution - WRTG391 (January 2019) Week 6 Discussion (dq1+dq2)
Answered by debbie
Expert Rating: 192 Ratings
Dated: 7th Nov'19 09:52 AM
5 words and 1 attachment(s).
Tutorial Rating: Not Rated
Sold 0 times.
(preview of the tutorial; some sections have been intentionally blurred)
…Please…

attachments

WRTG391-Week-6-Discussion-dq1,2.docx
Preview of WRTG391-Week-6-Discussion-dq1,2.docx
about     effect   two other     In       cite   sources 2     the       authors   not give     in       facts   the impressions     police       community   on the     3       the   by Shelton     (2006)       results   the study     Barak,       one   Although they     watching       doesn’t   the verdicts     down,       Shelton   found that     did       type   had higher     scientific       less   to convict     based       The   of the     Baskin       differ   all of     studies       that   more time     spent       shows,   less likely     to       in   absence of     4       article,   learned that     should       in   way that     and       Making   words flow     one       struggle   so reading     as       me   on ways     On       I   that judges,     police       think   CSI effect     bigger       it   It was     the