NR602 week 6 - Presentation and summary - TOPIC: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection in Women

Asked by sharpie
Dated: 29th Oct'18 05:41 PM
Bounty offered: $40.00


Grand Rounds

Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion.

Description

In Weeks 2 and 6, you will create a Grand Rounds presentation on the topic assigned to you by the faculty member.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

1. Describe the most commonly prescribed drugs use in primary care for the chose condition.

2. Utilize clinical guidelines, research articles or other materials to support your findings.

3. Identify any practice barriers, issues, or problems (including cultural diversity and healthcare literacy).

4. Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

Due Dates: Pediatric Grand Rounds due Week 2 (please see specific days/times below)

Women’s Health Grand Rounds due Week 6 (please see specific days/times below)

Total Points Possible: Week 2 - 150 points

Week 6 – 150 points

Requirements:

Keep in mind the following guidelines and grading criteria while taking part in this assignment:

The Grand Rounds presentation will consist of a patient scenario that is assigned to you by your faculty in week one. The presentation is a video recording in Kaltura. Recording of the presentation should be interesting, professional, and focused to the topic. Wear your lab coat and name tag/badge during the recording. You must use a visual aid during your presentation.

  • Record and upload presentation by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Begin facilitating discussion and continue to lead it throughout the week.
  • Participate in ongoing interactive dialogue by responding to a minimal of two (2) of your peer’s discussion questions by Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
  • Participate in all faculty directed questions to your presentation by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
  • Utilize a minimal of six peer reviewed scholarly articles from Chamberlain Online Library and/or current evidence based clinical guidelines to support your findings.
  • Discuss Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical physical assessment findings of the assigned topic.
  • List and discuss a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses.
  • Discuss any applicable diagnostic studies to confirm diagnosis of assigned topic. If not diagnostic studies applicable state this in presentation and why it is not applicable to assigned topic
  • Discuss prevention (if not applicable, discuss why).
  • Discuss Treatment including non-pharmacologic management and pharmacologic management. (if not applicable, discuss why Discuss patient and/or family education.
  • Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT - In addition to submitting your presentation, you will also need to lead a discussion on your topic in the discussion thread. The initial post and Kaltura presentation are both due by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. NOTE: By Wednesday, you will also initiate a discussion to lead.

Discussion Lead Requirement: Develop three (3) questions on your topic you can ask to initiate the discussion and keep it going.

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, respond substantively to a minimal of two (2) peers’ presentation questions**If all students have a response, then choose the student with the least responses to their posting.

By Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, summarize your grand rounds presentation by posting a summary reply to your initial post in the discussion thread. Summarize the discussion as well as conclusions from the collective group discussion. Include evidence based references at the bottom of the summary AND respond to ALL faculty questions regarding your presentation.

Grand Rounds Presentation Criteria

Category

Points

Description

Introduction

20

Introduction of topic that include pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Clinical Assessment

10

Discussed typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic.

Differential Diagnoses

20

List AND discuss of a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis. (if not applicable, discuss why)

Prevention and Treatment Options

10

Discuss prevention and treatment options for chosen topic.(if not applicable, discuss why)

Education

10

Discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10

Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes, include follow up care.

Lead Discussion

10

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) discussion question for peers.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, Interactive dialogue with at least two peer’s initial presentation by responding substantively to all questions posed and citing related research to support.

Summary Requirement

10

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, add summary post to own grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Include conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

Evidence Based Articles and/or Practice Clinical Guidelines

10

Include minimal of six (6) evidence based Peer Reviewed articles from Chamberlain Online Library and/or clinical practice guidelines

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10

Responds to ALL faculty directed questions on initial presentation. Includes scholarly support from EBP clinical guidelines and/or peer reviewed journal articles obtained from Chamberlain Online Library.

Presentation Development

10

Overall Presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura. Labcoat and name badge are present. Visual aid used during presentation.

Total

150

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric PowerPoint Presentation- Week 6

Criterion

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points = 150

Introduction

20 Points

15 Points

10 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic that include a detailed review of pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic, but omits one of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits two of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides vague description of 1-2 of the following criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits all three of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides vague description of all three (2) criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Does not present an Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic.

Clinical Assessment

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discussion in detail 4 typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic.

Discussion in detail of 3 typical clinical findings.

Discussion in detail of 2 typical clinical findings

Discussion of one (1) clinical assessment finding

OR

List of clinical assessment findings instead of a discussion.

Does not describe any clinical assessment findings.

Differential Diagnoses

20 Points

15 Points

10 Points

8 Points

0 Points

List AND discuss in detail a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

List AND discuss in detail two (2) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

List three differential diagnosesbut does not include a discussionwith scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

List two or less differential diagnosesbut does not include a discussionwith scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

Does not list and discuss differential diagnoses.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis and rationale and scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with rationale, but omits scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with scholarly support but omits rationale.

Vague discussion of of diagnostic studies and labs used to confirm diagnosis, omits both the rationales AND scholarly support from clinical. guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Does not discuss diagnostic studies/labs.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication and non-pharmacological options.

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication, does not include non-pharmacological option(s).

Discuss treatment options but does not include one of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Discuss treatment options but does not include two or more of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Does not discuss prevention and treatment options.

Education

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discusses in detail patient AND family education for chosen grand rounds topic with rationales.

Provides a general discussion of patient and family education with rationales.

Lists patient and family education instead of a discussion with rationales.

Lists patient OR education instead of a discussion without inclusion of rationales.

OR

Information discussed is vague or unclear.

Does not discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care.

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication. Omits expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment. Includes expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication AND omits expected follow up care.

Does not address outcomes.

Lead Discussion

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Fully, facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) open discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least two (2) discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least one (1) discussion questions for peers. Question posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic with two to three (2-3) questions BUT questions posed does not allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Does not lead discussion.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue

Summary Requirement

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Includes conclusions from thecollective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation with conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic but information presented is not clear or difficult to follow.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary to the original grand rounds presentation but omits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary BUT does not summarizes the initial discussion ANDomits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic

Student does not post a summary.

Evidence Based Research

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Includes six (6) evidence based Peer Reviewed journal articles (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guidelines from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Includes five (5) evidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Include four (4) evidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Includes two to three (2 – 3) evidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

OR

Two or more articles are older than 7 years

Does not includeevidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student responds substantively with additional insight to all faculty directed questions. This includes question(s) to the individual student and any questions posed to the class as a whole by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds substantively to at least one faculty directed questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to two or more faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to only one faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue with faculty.

Presentation Development

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Overall presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura.Lab coat and name badge present. Visual aid is present during presentation.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing one (1) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat, name badge not present, or visual aid is not used.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing two (2) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat ,no name badge present, or visual aid is not used.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing three (3) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat ,no name badge present, or visual aid is not used.

Overall presentation is not clear OR missing four or more of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat ,no name badge present, or visual aid is not used.

Deductions

5 pointDeduction for students who do not respond to peers by Friday 11:59pm MT

15 points(10%) deduction for presentations submitted after 11:59pm MT on Wednesday

Note: Students will not receive credit for work in the threads submitted after Sunday, 11:59pm MT

Total Points

of 150 points

NR602 week 6 - Presentation and summary - TOPIC: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection in Women
Answered by sharpie
Expert Rating: 385 Ratings
Dated: 29th Oct'18 05:41 PM
5 words and 2 attachment(s).
Tutorial Rating: Not Rated
Sold 0 times.
(preview of the tutorial; some sections have been intentionally blurred)
…Please…

attachments

Human-papillomavirus-(HPV)-Infection-in-Womenweek-6.pptx (1925.86 KB)
Preview of Human-papillomavirus-(HPV)-Infection-in-Womenweek-6.pptx
be     the   of the     identify       the   varieties of     is       above   years in     Pap       people   HPV infection     symptomsGenital       most   visible symptoms     infectionThey       diagnoses   as:Condylomata- symptom     carcinoma       carcinomaKeratosis   simplexFamilial Benign     Studies       no   that have     to       the   or mouthHPV     be       culturesThis   leaves the     to       and   acid testDNA     Pap       can   abnormalities that     to       are   by Centers     Control       girls   11-12To reduce     of       due   HPV infections     number       latex   which have     to       transmitting   reduce risk     infections       one   wear shoes     in
Summary-of-Human-papillomavirus-in-Women.docx (23.34 KB)
Preview of Summary-of-Human-papillomavirus-in-Women.docx
spread     oral,   or anal     are       establish   HPV status     examination       if   visible genital     suspect       or   partner is     genital       are   used to     on       HPV   recommended age     the       is   years, with     30-65       have   HPV test     Pap       five   (Tu, Wang,     Chan,       can   conducted on     of