MCJ 6374 - Explain the process, step by step, that electronic evidence must follow to be admitted at trial

Asked by nerdygirl
Dated: 27th Nov'18 06:40 PM
Bounty offered: $10.00

Explain the process, step by step, that electronic evidence must follow to be admitted at trial. You must make reference to the necessary Federal Rules of Evidence. You should also discuss at least one illustrative case example.

Identify and explain at least three different types of searches in digital crime and digital terrorism. You must include a discussion of at least one relevant case

Identify and explain at least three different federal statutes related to digital crime.
MCJ 6374
Answered by nerdygirl
Expert Rating: 200 Ratings
Dated: 27th Nov'18 06:40 PM
5 words and 3 attachment(s).
Tutorial Rating: Not Rated
Sold 1 times.
(preview of the tutorial; some sections have been intentionally blurred)
…to…

attachments

Digital-crime-and-digital-terrorism-involves-computer-crime-or-cybercrime.docx (20.5 KB)
Preview of Digital-crime-and-digital-terrorism-involves-computer-crime-or-cybercrime.docx
stealing     so   one can     transaction       to   results to     can       data   they enter     by       a   which is     or       enter   data which     a       mostly   to employees     is       is   scam which     use       to   victims and     of       digital   and digital     the       of   threatening the     and       Government   take a     to       crimes   enhance the     either       Government   use their    
ans-1-1.docx (21.45 KB)
Preview of ans-1-1.docx
know     rules   you get     where       that   it will     enough       What   left after     all       are   and all     have       are   rules that     every       cases   that are     or       tools   survival must     mastered       you   solve the     of       arise   preparing and    
Government-statutes--ans-3.docx (28.27 KB)
Preview of Government-statutes--ans-3.docx
weapon     the   similarly, might     utilizing       statutes   U S     922)       the   "wires" as     for       behavior   permit prosecutors     the       violations   instance, a     incorporates       correspondence   to portray     by       behavior   is sufficiently     envelop       dialect   found, for     a       (18   S C     In       leading   betting over     can       the   government betting     U       1084)   the government     regularly       behavior   utilizing existing     are       to   arraignments including     with       the   of particular     PCs,       PC   action are     violations,       extortion   U S     77q),       U   C §     and       access   (18 U     §       (18   S C     Three       unequivocally   to PCs     keep       charging   related action     extortion       C   1343), copyright     U       506   and unlawful     stolen       S   § 2314)     shows       that   effectively versatile     wide       behavior   to cheat     or       "impalpable   to legitimate